tera gold their behavior constitutes a breach of - ZWM－d377922osa的部落格

129781863578281250_944"I would like to have a home, a place that doesn't need much". Buying real estate is the top priority among many people life, but in the process of buying a House always is part of the consumers buy only after he found himself falling into the trap, when the developers check out is required by all means, but for various reasons the other party refused to check out. So, how do consumers safeguard rights? Lawyers advise, as long as the purchaseBought a new house in the following four scenarios, consumers can select check out break. Area error check out cases: in May 2010, the woman bought a three-bedroom house in a complex. Contract: housing construction area of 120 square meters, construction area of pricing, $ 5,000 per square meter. After the contract is signed tera gold, ladies pay all purchasesParagraph. In February 2011 tera gold, the completed building, by actually measuring the gross floor area of only 108 square meters. Subsequently, this prosecution to local courts.��Court hearing, require developer support Ms AW returned prepaid and pay claims for interest. Lawyer comments: the Supreme People's Court concerning the trial of some problems of law applicable to the sale contract disputesInterpretation of article 14th: seller's delivery of housing in the area or an area of the mercenary contract area, and have agreed in the contract, by Convention; the absence of an agreed or explicitly agreed in the contract, in accordance with the following principles: (a) within area than the absolute value of error in 3% (3%), in accordance with the contract priceReal settlement, the buyer requested contract, not supported, (b) area than the absolute value of errors beyond 3% tera power leveling, contract the buyer request, returned home and paid interest, should be supported. Involved in the case of the housing area of error than to 10%, goes far beyond 3%, Ms AW claims check out, and asked the developers to refund and interest of the purchase should be CourtHolding. Good design can be modified to check out cases: in January last year, Ms Tang in a community looking at a House, and after the community developer signed a purchase contract. According to the plan annexed to the contract, Ms Tang bought House of two bedrooms has a wide French window. However when the room, she found in the original design of the two Windows, one is completely sealed, and the other isInto a fire door and fire window. Ms Tang that developers allowed to change housing design, find developers require check out and pay for the damage.��After the Court believes that developers change design without authorization constitutes a default, was sentencing Ms developer checkout and compensate Tang-related losses. Lawyer comment: my article 24th of the sales management approach:Real estate development enterprise should be in accordance with the approved plans, designing commercial housing construction. After the sale of commercial housing, real estate companies are not allowed to change the plan, design.��In this case, developers of serious violations of the above provisions, their behavior constitutes a breach of, Ms Tang right to checkout and compensate losses. Check out extension housing case: on June 8, 2010, the summer Lady bought aResidential property under construction, first before the contract the following year on September 1. Date of the contract, summer ladies 30% Housing Authority down payment was delivered, used loans to pay for the rest. The loan approval is obtained, summer Lady began a monthly repayment to the Bank. Developer has no room to the summer Lady. Summer ladies find developers, developers say can be agreed upon in the contract by the dayPayment of delayed performance penalty. Drag like this for 9 months, developers are not key to the summer Lady. Summer Lady to take proceedings before a court, require check out and pay for the damage.��After the court hearing, according to support the claims of the summer Lady. Lawyer comments: the Supreme People's Court concerning the trial of application of laws to the mercenary contract disputes of interpretation of the 15thArticle: according to the provisions of the contract law of the 94th, seller's delay in delivery or buyer to delay payment for housing purchases, after publicizing notice within a reasonable time limit of 3 months is still not in compliance, rescind the contract party requests, should be supported.��In this case, developers had overdue Room 9 months, check out summer woman is entitled to request. Change of circumstances can check out case last April, Mr Li and a developer signed a purchase agreement, the two sides agreed: Mr LEE to pay down payment $ 200,000, remaining funds through bank payment in the form of mortgage loans. But as he prepared to loan material when the Bank has received a new notification, requires that the applicant must provide proof of more than 1 year-paid and proof of social security, Mr LEE is unable to provide such material, so heLoan application should naturally be the Bank "dismissed". Mr Li was unable to round up the remaining House, check out only to developers. Can be disappoint him was, by the developer for his purchase contract has been in force, refused to refund down payments.��Mr LI in desperation, to the courts, requires developers to refund down payments of $ 200,000. Lawyer comments: the Supreme People's Court of theOn the application of People's Republic of China contract law problems of interpretation (ii) article 26th: since the establishment of the contract, objective conditions at the time of the conclusion of the contract could not have been foreseen by the parties, non-force majeure is not part of the commercial risk of significant changes, continue to perform the contract for a party clearly unfair or not for contract purposes, the Parties requested the Court to changeOr terminate the contract, the Court should be based on the principle of fairness, combined with the realities of the case to determine whether modification or rescission. In the civil law of "change of circumstances" principle. In this case, he cannot because of a State housing loan policy a major adjustment by means of a mortgage loan to complete the balance of payments, this is he at the time of the conclusion of the contract cannot be foreseen. If you continue toPerformance of contract, is bound to be unfair to Mr LEE, it should be "change of circumstances", may require termination of the purchase contract. Report: Pearl real estate marketing Innovation Summit: online integration to create holistic marketing solutions 2012-04-02 2012 top sales Innovation Summit was held on April 11, hundreds of enterprise executivesDiscuss industry change 2012-03-31 Chairman of the Board of Directors of e-House China Zhou Xin's message: new start, new platform, new journey 2012-04-01 Pearl market in top sales Innovation Summit: eight brands real estate the best waiter 2012-04-03

The Relative News: